One side wants to ‘get Brexit done’ while the other shouts the ‘NHS is not for sale!’. What does it all really mean?
Academic rigor, journalistic flair
Articles on Jeremy Corbyn
Displaying 21 - 40 of 307 articles
The BBC is looking exposed after a campaign in which it has taken fire from all sides.
The party leaders clashed over Brexit, Northern Ireland and the NHS.
Newspapers and broadcasters have been more likely to focus on issues the Conservatives want people to talk about.
Tactical voting and shifting party allegiances mean the final week could change everything.
Instagram has become a major battleground for the attention of young voters.
Investors in the private companies that Labour plans to nationalise are likely to seek compensation for their losses.
The voting public is being forced to wade through a fog of disinformation thanks to some cynical ploys.
The effect is the transfer of wealth away from the poorest workers.
Even if the Labour Party doesn’t win in 2019, it is aiming for a longer term shift.
Corbyn can’t get enough of Scotland while Johnson is playing it safe with strategic stop offs.
Both party leaders seem to elicit stronger negative responses than positive.
Conversation academic experts get behind the soundbites and campaign claims.
After years on the fence, Labour now has a position on the biggest topic of the day.
A close look at the way the parties are using video in the campaign can tell you a lot about their approach.
Things could have been quite different if Jeremy Corbyn swung more decisively to Remain or if Jo Swinson hadn’t been in such a rush to the polls.
With Labour in danger of coming fourth in Scotland, they could have done without fresh independence trouble.
The Australian Labor Party’s failure to turn climate change into a winning campaign issue holds lessons for the UK Labour Party.
Both main campaigns are focusing on the enemy, not the plan, in part, because the British political system hasn’t caught up with societal changes.
Broadcasters snubbing the likes of Nicola Sturgeon and Jo Swinson in favour of head-to-head debates with the two big party leaders just serves to stoke political tensions.
Top contributors
-
Senior Lecturer, Department of Government, University of Essex
-
Professor, Department of Government, University of Essex
-
Executive Dean, City, University of London
-
Professor of Political History, University of Nottingham
-
Founding Director of the Sir Bernard Crick Centre for the Public Understanding of Politics, University of Sheffield
-
Lecturer in British Politics/Public Policy, School of Politics and International Relations, Queen Mary University of London
-
Ashbel Smith Professor, School of Economic, Political and Policy Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas
-
Professor of Politics, Queen Mary University of London
-
Honorary Research Fellow in Politics, University of Stirling
-
Professor of Management, University of Essex
-
Head of Politics, Sheffield Hallam University
-
Associate Tutor in Politics and Social Sciences, Edge Hill University
-
Senior Lecturer in Politics, Edge Hill University
-
Associate Professor of British Politics, University of Leeds
-
Assistant researcher, University of Sydney
